Friday, February 18, 2011

Bp Machine Said I Have Irregular Heartbeat

... Happy Birthday to You

Today was confirmed the disqualification of three days for spitting at a Lavezzi Rosi, after the SSC Napoli had appealed, charging the lawyer Grassani.
seemed obvious the lifting of the ban or at least (and already would have been an injustice) the loss of his sentence. The image "by proof TV (including Sky) did not show the clarity - CLARITY - that law and for the previous question must be demonstrated.
But no. During the trial were presented different images, images of the show "reverse". That is the same as Sky, just a little 'more magnified. According to the court sufficient for conviction.
Fine. So at this point, let us tell some lies: Lavezzi not say that had already been warned (mitigating factor for purposes of proceedings "test tv), we also say that the Argentine has started it without being provoked, we continue to lie and say that even in Mediaset spitting image of the Pocho is obvious, clear and precise. Even if we admit this, this ruling issued today, by law, is invalid. Presents a huge defect. For this reason (notes omitted are irrelevant for the purposes of my speech):

part art. 101 cpc

The Judge , unless the law provides otherwise (2) , may not decide on any application if part against the proposal which was not duly summoned (3) and did not appear (4) . If you think you put
basis of the decision to issue a detected motion, the court reserves decision, giving the parties, on pain of nullity, a period of not less than twenty and not more than forty days from the communication for filing at the Court of memories containing observations on the same issue.

That is, in other words, we can not present evidence does not "agreed" previously, unless 40 days pass! That is, if the instance of First Instance has been debated on the images of Sky, also the second instance (appeal) must be debated on the same tests. Other evidence only after 40 days.

So here's a clear violation of the Code of Civil Procedure very, very serious. The point is that if the lawyer Grassani is put to use again (it has the right to do so) would rise at least another week, and at the discount of the penalty will be one day, then two days a few jumps strength. Catania and Milan.

Needless to say the least, because I realize the "heaviness" of the post. But I want to connect to the top of the post: for me this was a bad day, because I wondered what sense does it follow this league. And do not say that someone is hindering Naples or Milan wants to win. I'm saying that today there is was a manifest injustice, or wanting to be positive, was punished by a professional ethics in a manner different from other professionals, the former are clear. (And we'll see what becomes of Gattuso). So I wondered, for example, because look at Milan Napoli, I've heard about me the shadow of Calciopoli, many ghosts. I thought if it's worth watching, knowing that there is no justice at all healthy, finding - see what a paradox! - On the same wavelength of the President, as you can see the tiny, I'm not talking about De Laurentiis.

Then I saw the schedule. Today is February 18. Roberto Baggio turned 45 today. I saw the video of his exit, a Milan Brescia in which greets all with a beautiful comment by Caressa. There Maldini, hugged him, and that Roby moved out. And the entire audience applauded him standing Rossoneri. I thought the public and AC Milan Baggio. I thought it was out of respect for Milan fans that I see the game and continue to follow this league. They have nothing to do with Article 101 of the Code of Civil Procedure: it is not fair to give up certain standards, I thought about Baggio. We too would have applauded the Napoli fans, if that was the St. Paul and not the Meazza. The law is not equal for everyone, but football does. And in the end he won the goal for this football is a faith and the Law no. Faith is for the few, but when there is equal for all, not about the money or power, or minor wives, politicians or ordinary people. The point is that those who applaud Baggio in this way must be respected, because they are our brothers of faith, and respect for them that I follow the series C from Naples, who will follow in Champion League or Europe where there can not be said.

who applauds the sample, have faith, to those who prevent the field, rest assured that is not our brother . De André was praying in the name of one who disobeys the laws of Branco, in the name of a person of faith disturbing, "Do not forget their faces, that after so much skid, it is just fair that Fortune will help them (...) as an anomaly. "By the way, congratulations to him.


0 comments:

Post a Comment